BOOGEYLAND RESERVATION

Fresh Loyals

damirniksic — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:52:11 +0000

Since the 1990s many blond friends of mine learned very well how to use advantages of being blond. They learned it quickly! During their stay in predominantly “blond” countries of the “Free World” they realized they can change their attitude from the humble and scared Muslims (which they were in the context of Serbo-Croat-Slovene (South Slavic) Empire where local Slavs could tell they were Muslims (second-grade citizens) mostly by their Muslim names), into the white supremacy-sort-of attitude, only by changing their first names and counting on their white-European looks.

Bitches are the most successful in this metamorphosis/ transformation, bitches and gay guys. They play on that racial card because it is most superficial – it is the looks. Plain “looks”. (She’s got the look!)

So if you look right: blond, with blue eyes and shit, you can adopt that superior blond-racial attitude and identify yourself with “the winners”, escaping from “the looser” part of your identity.

I understand that. Well, brother or sister have chosen to spend the rest of their lives as human beings. They chose not to suffer any more. They chose equality. They took their chance and made their decisions. Good luck! I have no problem with that. I respect that. No Slavic brother or sister, Serb, Croat or Slovene will ever make them feel inferior again. No more second-grade citizen shit. I can dig it. I can feel it.

But what about the rest of us? How do they feel about the rest of us, less fortunate non-blond Bosnian or Slavic-speaking Muslim brothers and sisters – the so-called “Black Caucasians”, Pseudo-Moors from the Balkans, from the South-Eastern Europe, us with some ”non-european” blood and racial/facial features? Do they want to help us out now, when in position?

They have that look in their eyes when being with their “former brothers and sisters”, that attitude…. They became more “special”, more demanding, more predator-like. They act and feel superior, like masters, when with us. They want to be served, attended by us.

What is that all about?

Like we don’t have enough of that attitude when interacting and communicating with “our masters”. Like we need some kind of confirmation, some “reality check” from our own people that the things are like that in Europe, and we should leave if we don’t like it? Well we can leave, but who is going to clean your toilets then? It is going to be you my blond friend, cause once “dark” immigrants are gone, it is your turn to fill that niche. We exist only to make you look good, to make you look “white” and “blond” enough. So you better thank God we are here.

In order to complete their metamorphosis, the last step, I guess, is to make “their own” feel and look inferior. I think that is the final test they need to pass: if my own people does not recognize me anymore, if they perceive me as “master race”, than I have finally made it!

Like Michael Jackson and Edie Murphy Master-slave dialectics here:

Who knows what kind of game they play out there, in the streets, every day, while shopping and walking – who they think they are?

Once in Chicago, I walked by a Slavic blonde. We passed each other in the middle of a bridge. We were only two people on that bridge at that moment. You could tell she was Russian, or from Ukraine, some Eastern Europe trashy looking hooker. She was all dressed up, and she could smell I wasn’t American, as I could smell she wasn’t American, but she had that attitude, like she made it, in the society, like she was better than me, although I was professor at the local university at the time.

That is what I am talking about, that Slavic blond-attitude within the immigrant community – “I am more white than you”. They learned that thing very fast. If she only knew that I wasn’t Christian, well that would be a double win for her, and I would be a double-loser. I would be a Slavic sand-n***er.

I still don’t know if they are happy when they run into “paisan”, or not. Sometimes they need us to confirm their “evolution”, but sometimes, when they avoid us because we know who and what they really are.

What I am saying is that “Blond Muslims” tend to forget their cultural tradition more easily than dark Muslims, since the door of the racial supremacy (opportunities) is widely open for them and very tempting too. I am saying this from my own experience. I testify it.

But they are not to blame. They didn’t invent this concept – they found it on the street. It fell from a truck.

So when I point my finger toward my newly-racist old blond friends who figured out how to profit from their blond-awareness and enjoy their lives – does it make me a racist?

You don’t have to protect them from my alleged racism, because their racism does that job very well. Their racism protects them from bad karma of a “non-white” or “non-blond” person. That is the reason they became racists in the first place. They play “blond” – because it pays off. It does!

That is the real racism – one you don’t have to state with words. Real racism works for you silently. It does not need no sound. Just a picture. It works for you through the way you look. That is the main thing, defining element of racism – the picture, whether it is color or black-and-white – it is the picture that counts. The visual element!

That picture speaks a thousand words. It speaks for you. You don’t have to say anything, it is all over you, and it is screaming – look I am white and blond, and so on – I am one of you! and it helps you through your life and career, through the society.

Just a picture. No sound.

You don’t have to insult others with words. You just need to accept and embrace that racist concept and perceive your race as an advantage in the new society, in order to confirm and support the concept of being non-white as disadvantage. That alone is racist and insulting. You just need to conform and say nothing. Play along and say nothing! – that is all you need to do. That is racism. Knowing it and being quiet is racism. Not just passive, but very active racism, because you are using it. You may not be saying it, but you are doing it.

And you should speak up, especially as a white, blond person. You should speak up and tell us about your advantages, give up your advantages, your privileges as a white, blond person. You of all should become an activist.

We know that the very way you look breaks all ices and opens all doors for you and you do not complain about that. Why would you. You accept it – you conform, you don’t fight it – you use it, you profit from it, and you want to leave it that way, the way you found it.

That is why you don’t want me to point my finger to your “blond privileges”. That is why every time when I do that – you call it racism. You want to silence me and keep things as they are. You find my language offensive. Of course it is offensive! Your attitude is offensive to me. The concept you support is offensive to me, because in this situation – silence works for you. Silence always work for people like you, (especially if you are a dumb blond), and we both know that it does not work for me!

If the audio was up, and picture was down – it would work better for me. I would have better chance because I can be eloquent and do that shit better than you. But you want me to shut up, because you want to impose your rules, your game. In your game all you need is to strike a pose and be a blond.

That is why you turn the audio down and saturate the picture, put more contrast in it, because you have nothing to say, you don’t need to say anything, and it works for you better!

I have to speak up in order to show, to prove that I am a human being too, that I think – therefore I exist; that I am right too, that I have my rights too, as opposed to you who don’t need to speak, ’cause you happen to “look right”.

I may sound as racist, but you don’t have to sound at all, and that is the difference. I have to expose my position, my opinion, to write it down, to go around and talk about it – you don’t. You just expose your blond passport to high society, your deep blue eyes, and you don’t have to say no more.

You believe that your silence or your calm tone makes you right, even if it perpetuates the entire racist concept. You actually believe that you being quiet about your advantages and privileges based on your race is more right than me being loud about my disadvantages based on my race. Well that is insulting. That is racist in the first place, because you want to quiet me, and keep the status quo which works for you. You don’t want changes. That is racist, racist, racist, racist.

Every time when “brother” or “sister” reminds a “brother or sister” of what they really are, what they used to be, their “roots”, they turn to their new friends for protection and accuse their “brothers and sisters” of religious fundamentalism and shit. And that breaks our hearts, not because we are loosing “Muslim brothers and sisters”, but because it is offensive.

If someone I know, I love, I care for, someone mine, even from my family, can turn against me, or start avoiding me because of my racial features, change his or her attitude, disrespect me or marginalize me because of my “darker look”, then what I suppose to expect from those racists I see for the first time, those who never grew up with me?

So these girls and guys, these brainwashed racists among us – they are not just plain racists: they are racist ass-holes. Those white Slavic-speaking Muslims who took advantage of the color of their skin, hair, eyes, who changed their Muslim first names, who associated themselves with local right-wing parties, who made careers, even got into the EU parliament as example of what a “real white European should do” – those who distanced them from the “Brown man’s” religion, culture, tradition, who distanced them from their brothers and sisters, their civil and human rights – those are real servants, real house-slaves, real trash, real disgrace.

Because their change can’t be based only on their individual decision. I don’t believe that shit. Individual decision. Who cares about your individual decision. I can turn green – who cares, unless it is symbolic, political, important, and special gesture that works for “the man”. So there must be a trade. There must be a wink.

It is not about civil or human rights. Civil or human rights is about being able to become successful and rich and wealthy without having to change our names and our identities, without rejecting your roots.

That is not a real success!

That is not a real career!

That is a career with a puppeteer!

There is always a pimp behind such a gesture. I am talking about “the man” and his “project”. I am talking about Fresh Loyals. I am talking about generating the generation of those who reject their roots, their souls. I am talking about brainwashed ambitious wannabes. I am talking about human trash, about those who are ready to give up their souls for the power based on color of their skin, hair, eyes. Those are not our ambassadors, our representatives, those are nothing but empty puppets. Fresh Loyals.

“Black Caucasians” and the Blond Slavic Empire

damirniksic — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:46:56 +0000

It all started in 19th century with Pan-Slavic movement, the awareness of Slavic race, Slavic culture, Slavic genius, Slavic supremacy, etc… It fueled the idea of Yugoslavia, or Slavic South. This idea was about the racial definition of the Western Balkans.

The Soviet Empire was a part of same Pan-Slavic dream, only that the racial element was hidden beneath Marxist ideology. Communism was nothing but Slavic racism – painted red.

Yugoslavia did not make part of that Slavic Empire due to Tito’s no to Stalin in 1948. Only after the dissolution of both Soviet Union and Socialist Yugoslavia, Russian interests became more visible and present in the Western Balkans.

Montenegro, Serbia and Serb Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina came under direct Russian influence, both political and economic. But another phenomenon accompanied this – growing racism.

It was about blond, Slavic, European, Christian, against dark, “Turk”, wild, Afro-Asian, Muslim people.

This situation generated the category of “Black Caucasians” represented mostly by Chechen nation, and also by Bosniaks, or Albanians. All of them are natives to their lands but perceived as “colonizers” by their “colonizers” who rewrote the histories of those regions in their centers. The very existence of these “tribes”, and their attachment to their lands represents an obstacle for Slavic Christian Empire. They have been, and still are treated as primitive and wild tribes, placed in their reservations, isolated, heavily administered, living in their ghettoes.

They have common history and represent same problem along the borders of the “Slavic Christian World”, regions where this world is bordering with “the Other”. It is not a border between Occident and Orient, but North and South. It is a border between the “Blond World” and the “Dark World”, border between the races, not just cultures or religions.

Contemporary Skinheads of Russia consider every non-white person a black person. Therefore “Black Caucasians”. It is interesting that 19th century spiritual leader of Chechens was a Dervish, a Sufi master who started his own school of Qadiri Sufi order advocating passive resistance to Tzarist Russia. His name was Kunta-Hajji. KUNTA-HAJJI!

Sounds like a combination of ethnic slurs!

Having in mind that “hajji” is used by U.S. military and Russian Skinheads to describe an Arab person (usually translated as “wog” – meaning “dark-skinned person”), as well as the fact that name “Kunta” evokes “the Roots” and well-known Kunta Kinte – the central character whose name can also be used in negative sense as a slur for black people – it is almost amazing how well this historical fact works for newly created category of “Black Caucasians” represented by Chechens.

No matter what the next text says, all of these peoples are natives to their lands. Somebody just wants to take over their land, to get rid of them, and that process is organized and directed from the centers of power. These centers are connected by the same interest.

It is the white, blond, Slavic Russian Moscow which makes plans and decisions involving lives of millions of different peoples and groups in that part of the world. It is not a White House, but the Red Square, (or should I say – the Blond Square) in the center of new Russian Empire, governing that part of the world. If Russia has these ambitions, than it is time to change its attitude, to open towards different cultures and races and accept diversity.

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC
THE CHANGING MAP IN THE BALKANS

By Frederick Moore

Author of “The Balkan Trail” and Correspondent of the Associated Press

…The Turks added to their Semitic blood some of the finest manhood of the races of Southeastern Europe. Turks whose appearance is thoroughly European and Turks with fair hair and straight noses are to be distinguished throughout Western Turkey from the distinctive Semitic type; and some of the best brains in the recent Young Turk movement are European brains.
The infusion of European blood had a certain minor effect upon the character of the Turk, but the greater change came upon the converts and their offspring. The blight of the Mohammedan creed, which impairs all better civilizations that it touches, affected the Europeans only less seriously than it had the Asiatics whom it reached.
When Europeans became Mohammedans they became to all intents Turks and called themselves such; they were no longer Greek, Servian, or Bulgarian, as the case might be. In spirit if not in blood they were wholly gone over to the other race. Such is the power of the Moslem faith!

BLACK Caucasians

damirniksic — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:50:29 +0000

Beheading and Shooting by Russian Neo-Nazis on Video

By C. J. CHIVERS
Published: August 15, 2007

MOSCOW, Aug. 14 — The Russian authorities said Tuesday that they were investigating a video recording of what appeared to be the grisly execution of two bound and gagged young men, filmed in a forest beneath a large Nazi flag. At least one of the men was beheaded on camera as he lay in a shallow grave.

The video, which appeared Sunday on several Russian ultranationalist Web sites, circulated on the Internet with a note from a previously unknown organization calling itself the National-Socialist Party of Russia. The note announced that a “military vanguard” had begun an armed struggle against “black colonists and those who support them from the Russian government.”

It demanded the expulsion from Russia of all Asians and people from the Caucasus and the granting of independence to all of Russia’s internal republics in the Caucasus.

The note also called for the resignation of President Vladimir V. Putin and the establishment of a government formed by Dmitri G. Rumyantsev, the leader of the National-Socialist Society, a neo-Nazi group.

It further demanded the release of Maksim Martsinkevich, the leader of Format 18, another Russian neo-Nazi group, who has been held since last month on charges of fomenting ethnic hatred and threatening violence.

It is not clear when or where the video was made.

But Aleksandr Verkhovsky, director of the SOVA Center, a private organization that examines hate crimes in Russia, said the video appeared to be real. Mark Tolchinsky, the acting spokesman for the Interior Ministry of Dagestan, a region in the Russian Caucasus, said investigators there had watched the video and also believed it to be authentic.

Slightly less than three minutes long, the video begins with scenes of the countryside and the title “Operation of the National-Socialist Party of Russia to Arrest and Execute Two Colonists From Dagestan and Tajikistan.” For a date, it gives only 2007.

The video then shows two terrified dark-skinned men kneeling in the forest under a Nazi flag. Each speaks through a gag in accented Russian, saying only, “We were arrested by National-Socialists.” One has been bound with heavy tape, the other with rope.

One of their captors shouts, “Glory to Russia!” and then lunges forward and decapitates one of the men with what appears to be a large knife. Heavy metal music plays throughout.

Later, the second captive is shown kneeling, head lowered. The bolt of a gun is heard to slam closed. The prisoner is shot in the head and falls face down into a grave. The video ends with two men in camouflage uniforms and black masks giving the Nazi salute.

The graphic scenes drew heavy traffic on Russian-language Web sites and prompted intensive commentary on Internet discussion groups. Many viewers, including those who identified themselves as nationalists, expressed horror and denounced the acts.

Nationalist Russian politicians reacted similarly and said the video was meant to discredit them. “This video tarnishes our image most of all,” Yevgeny Valyayev, an assistant to Nikolai V. Kuryanovich, a nationalist member of the lower house of Parliament, said by telephone.

“It’s a provocation, it’s clear,” he added. “In the near future similar things will happen.”

A spokesman for the national prosecutor general confirmed that the federal Interior Ministry and the F.S.B., a successor agency to the Soviet K.G.B. secret police, were investigating, but he provided no further comment.

Irina Zubareva, a spokeswoman for the Interior Ministry, told RIA Novosti, the official Russian news agency, that the video originally had been posted from two foreign Internet domains. That claim could not be confirmed.

Format 18 did not reply to queries sent by e-mail. A court in Moscow on Monday ordered Mr. Martsinkevich, the group’s leader, to be held in pretrial confinement.

Mr. Martsinkevich, who uses the name Hatchet, burst in on a debate between two journalists on the state of democracy in Russia earlier this year with about 20 followers and shouted, “Sieg heil!” and “Slaughter the liberals!” while making Nazi salutes. Since his arrest, his supporters have labeled him a “prisoner of conscience.”

There was no immediate indication whether the video had been made by members of his group, his sympathizers or — as many ultranationalists on Web sites suggested — by people seeking to discredit him and the larger movement he has personified.

Mr. Verkhovsky, who studies hate crimes, said the party claiming to have made the video had never been heard of before and might be a very small number of people, as few as two or three. “Usually such things are not done by members of well-known organizations, but by marginal people, even marginal for such movements,” he said.

Videotaped beheadings and executions, a gruesome propaganda tool used by insurgents in Iraq, have a history in Russia that predates the Iraq war.

Chechen separatists have been accused of beheading captured Russian soldiers since the first Chechen war, which began in 1994, and recordings of such grisly acts have circulated in markets in the Caucasus for years. Three British citizens and a New Zealander working for a British telecommunications company were abducted in Chechnya and beheaded in 1998 after being forced to confess on video to spying.

But Mr. Verkhovsky said the latest video was new ground for Russian ultranationalists and neo-Nazis, and perhaps a “symmetrical reaction to Chechnya.”

Michael Schwirtz contributed reporting.

Mosque attack in southwestern France

damirniksic — Sat, 31 May 2008 14:38:17 +0000

France arrests 8 over mosque attack
Wed, 28 May 2008 19:29:04

French police have arrested eight people, including several soldiers, over an arson attack on a mosque in southwestern France.

The suspects, aged 18 to 30, were taken into custody Wednesday for questioning over the April 20 attack in Colomier near the city of Toulouse, in which arsonists started a fire in the mosque entrance and trashed a next-door prayer room.

The arrests took place near the cities of Toulouse, Castres and Carcassonne, where two soldiers were reportedly detained at their barracks, AFP quoted local newspaper La Depeche du Midi as saying.

State prosecutor Michel Valet said it was “too soon to say” if the suspects had links to extreme-right groups.

President Nicolas Sarkozy has vowed to step up the fight against Islamophobia in France following the mass desecration last month of the Muslim section of the country’s biggest war cemetery.

France is home to Europe’s largest Muslim community, estimated at five million.

HE/MMN

France 2004

damirniksic — Sat, 31 May 2008 10:11:20 +0000

April 20, 2004

Minorities and integration

Anti-Islamism in France

by Scott Martens

One of the things I looked for during the recent discussion about anti-semitism in France was some statistics about anti-Islamic and anti-Arab violence for comparison. I was shocked that I couldn’t find any. The French government went out of its way to disagregate data about antisemitic attacks, but could not even be bothered to track attacks on mosques. I knew that there had been attacks on mosques – I remembered seeing them on the news – but no figures seemed to be available. All I could find was Tariq Ramadan, a fairly visible European Muslim intellectual, making the same complaint.

Today’s news from AFP leads me to think Ramadan may be on to something:

Swastikas drawn on the entry to a Strasbourg mosque

STRASBOURG (AFP) – Swastikas were painted on the gateway to a Strasbourg mosque before dawn Tuesday, according to police sources. Furthermore, the inscription “death to arab” (sic) was printed on the surrounding wall of this predominantly Turkish mosque in the Meinau district [of Strasbourg]. Two outdoor garbage cans were burned without causing damage to the building. The imam of mosque, who lives at the mosque, heard a noise around 2am and was able to put out the fire, according to the management of the Eyyub Sultan mosque at a press conference. They have made out a complaint.

The mosque spokesperson, Cengiz Dogan, said that “We condemn this unacceptable act, which unfortunately is not unprecedented.”

“This odious act targets the entire Muslim community and is a part of an atmosphere in which more and more racist and islamophobic acts are taking place,” added Abdelhaq Nabaoui, president of the Alsace regional council for Islamic affairs, who listed a number of “similar” events in the area.

Last week, a mosque in Hagenau (Bas-Rhin dept.) was the victim of an attempted arson and two swastikas were drawn on the building. A funeral parlour in Oberhausbergen, near Strasbourg, was also the target of an attempted arson and swastika-painting, according to Mr Nabaoui. Finally, at the beginning of April, five headstones – four Muslim and one Jewish – from the military semitary in the Cronenbourg district of Strasbourg were desecrated, notably by marking them with swastikas.

Alsace is a very conservative part of France, particularly with regard to religion. It may not be very representative. However, this sort of news leads me to wonder to what degree the recent upswing in reported anti-semitic acts in France might have to with increased attention as much as an actual increase in anti-Jewish sentiment, and whether anti-Islamic violence is being drastically underreported.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 20th, 2004 at 10:46 pm

Fight against Anti-Islamism

damirniksic — Sat, 31 May 2008 08:59:22 +0000

SELCUK GULTASLI	s.gultasli@todayszaman.com	International
Turkey Convinces Europe to Fight Against Anti-Islamism

The Council of Europe is set to fight against anti-Islamism as a priority policy for the first time. Anti-Islamism has been included in the text as a dangerous inclination that has to be fought against upon the insistence of Turkey at the historic summit that 46 Council members attended. The conclusion draft of the summit included the notion of “Islamophobia”. The inclusion of this notion in the European organizations’ documents for the first time is described as the success of Turkey. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan prioritized the issue on the agenda during his speech at the summit on May 16 and asked the Council to adapt effective mechanisms against anti-Islamism.

With Turkey’s support again, member states of the Council asked for the encouragement of inter-cultural and inter-religious dialogue to develop universal tolerance and reconciliation in the final declaration. A decision envisioning the Council to appoint a coordinator regarding this issue and a Local Administration Congress to take effective action has also been stated in the action plan. Analysts evaluate the decision as the crucial success of Turkey. Even an ordinary Muslim is perceived as a “potential terrorist” in the West following the September 11 attacks in the US as analysts pointed out and the summit decisions will contribute to overcoming this issue.

The 3rd Council of Europe summit has for the first time mentioned “Islamophobia” in the 9th paragraph of the Warsaw Declaration that was accepted on Tuesday, May 17. The Council has reached the following decisions regarding the issue: Condemnation of any kind of intolerance and discrimination based on gender, race and religious beliefs in particular, including Islamophobia and anti-Semitism, the fight against these within the framework of the Council of Europe and the use of effective mechanisms and rules to combat these problems.

Thus, anti-Islamism as well as anti-Semitism will be dealt with within the framework of legal proceedings. The Council reports will include anti-Islamist movements. The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) will closely monitor these movements. The Commission will record in which country anti-Islamism increases or how it is reflected.

18.05.2005

Confused racist

damirniksic — Sat, 31 May 2008 08:55:55 +0000

Fallaci wrote that terrorists had killed 6,000 people over the past 20 years in the name of the Quran and said the Islamic faith “sows hatred in the place of love and slavery in the place of freedom.”

After 20 years of such a horrifying activitiy they are still behind serbian militant christian extremists lead by Karadzic and Mladic who killed 8,000 Bosnian Muslims in three days in Srebrenica in 1995. doing it in the name of Christian and Slavic Supremacy over Bosnian “Turks”. It seems that mechanized nationalist, imperialist and racist ”christian militants” has better, more legal, more “rational” and more effective ways to kill more Muslims all around the world, during the shorter period of time, and without appearing as someone who ”sows hatred in the place of love and slavery in the place of freedom.”

However, the following is an example of islamophobic material.

http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina50525.htm

The Fall of Europe

Ali Sina

May, 25, 2005

In an act of total insanity, the Council of Europe, decided to ban criticism of Islam equating it to anti-Semitism.

Selcuk Gultasli in zaman.com wrote: “Anti-Islamism has been included in the text as a “dangerous inclination” that has to be fought against upon the insistence of Turkey at the summit that 46 Council members attended. The conclusion draft of the summit included the notion of “Islamophobia”. The inclusion of this notion in the European organizations’ documents for the first time is described as the success of Turkey.

This is the beginning of the fall of Europe. Anti-Islamism is not the same as anti-Semitism. Islam is a belief system, Semites are a race. We can’t equate a race to a doctrine. Racism is sheer evil. Apart from the fact that no race is better or worse than other races, unless one is Michael Jackson, one can’t change his race. Instigating hate against a race is instigating hate against mankind. Doctrines that instigate racial hate must be condemned and those who engage in racial slurs must be brought to justice.

Prohibiting criticism of Islam is like prohibiting criticism of Judaism or Christianity. No one in his right mind would suggest criticism of these religions should be banned. The very fact that these religions have reformed and have adapted to modern times is because they were criticized. Only during the inquisition, criticism of Christianity was against the law. Are we trying to introduce Islamic inquisition to appease Muslims? Are we trying to institute the blasphemy law that is practiced in Saudi Arabia , Pakistan and Iran to make Muslims happy? This is insane!

Islam advocates the hatred of the Jews in particular but also of Christians who according to the Quran have corrupted their Scripture and call Jesus the son of God. The Quran’s biggest condemnation is reserved for the people of other religions and of no religion. All these people, including Jews and Christians are considered to be najis and fuels of hellfire. This is hate. This is hate-mongering. There is no other way to put it. Why are we not banning the Quran? Why are we not condemning Islam for blatantly advocating hate?

The decision of the Council of Europe is oxymoronic. How can we condemn anti-Semitism if we are not allowed to criticize Islam that incites hatred of the Jews and says God transformed them into swine and apes? Is this not insult?

There is a fundamental difference between religions and people. One is made of flesh and bones and the other is merely a doctrine. People must be protected, but doctrines don’t need to be protected. They have to be scrutinized, questioned and if found dangerous or wrong, rejected. Doctrines that advocate the hatred of people must be criticized and banned, not protected. How can we protect the rights of people to life and to freedom if at the same time we protect doctrines that incite hatred against them? If someone calls Muslims filthy, untouchable, impure, he is inciting hate. He should be stopped. This is clearly a racial insult. But the Quran calls all of us who are not Muslims najis. Najis means filthy, untouchable, impure. Why criticizing this book of hate should be against the law? Is this not double standard? is this not hypocrisy? Is this not dhimmitude? Why Muslims should be allowed to insult everyone else but criticizing their hateful doctrine should be against the law?

This decision simply makes no sense. It is a contradiction. You can’t ban anti-Semitism and anti-Islamism at the same time. Islam is anti-Jew and anti-Human. The two don’t go together. They are mutually exclusive.

Today May 25, 2005 an Italian judge, Armando Grasso, in city of Bergamo, ordered the best-selling writer and journalist Oriana Fallaci to stand trial in her native Italy on charges she defamed Islam in her book “La Forza della Ragione” (The Force of Reason)

In it, Ms Fallaci. argues that Europe is turning into “an Islamic province, an Islamic colony” and that “to believe that a good Islam and a bad Islam exist goes against all reason”.

Adel Smith, president of the Muslim Union of Italy, sued the writer, claiming that Ms Fallaci’s book is offensive to Muslims.

So what? The Quran is offensive to all Mankind. No one, including Ms. Fallaci, can go far enough to insult Muslims the way the Quran insults non-Muslims, calling them, kafir (blasphemers), najis, fuels for hellfire, enemies of God, etc. But the Quran does not stop there. It actually incites violence against the non-Muslims. Muhammad asked his followers to instill terror in the hearts of the unbelievers, to wage war against them, to smite their heads from above their necks, to deceive them, to kill them wherever they find them, even to rape their wives. Why such a book should be protected and why criticizing it should be banned?

Europe is threading a very dangerous path. Two things can happen in Europe:

Islam is left alone to grow unchecked, which means Europe will succumb to Islamism before the end of this century. Or
The Europeans sense the danger too late, panic, and give birth to Eurofascism to counter Islamofascism.

In either case Europe will be destroyed.

Curtailing freedom of speech, specially banning criticism of a doctrine of hate is foolishly dangerous. Europe is playing with fire. The path that Europe has taken today will lead to its fall before the end of this century, but more likely it will auto disintegrate in a civil war in the next two or three decades.

Concerned Europeans must:

Write to their Prime Ministers, Presidents and MPs and demand for freedom of speech and freedom to criticize doctrines of hate. Islam should not have privileges that Christianity, Judaism or any other religion does not have.
Organize campaigns to defend freedom of speech and beat the resolution of the Council of Europe.
Support candidates that are conscientious and are not willing to sell their souls and your country to Islamists for vote.
Politicians are like prostitutes, one will do anything for your money, and the other will do anything for your vote. Boycott those politicians who pander to Muslims for their votes with your vote.
Support parties that have anti Muslim immigration policies and are not afraid to call a spade a spade. At this moment, saving Europe is more important than your political ideology. Bite the bullet and vote for parties that you don’t like but have clearly the interest of saving your country from Islamofascism in mind.

Sign the petition. Keep Turkey out of Europe

ISLAM AND RACE:

When Europeans became Mohammedans they became to all intents Turks and called themselves such; they were no longer Greek, Servian, or Bulgarian, as the case might be. In spirit if not in blood they were wholly gone over to the other race. Such is the power of the Moslem faith!

Frederick Moore, NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC 1912

Muslim graves latest target of Austria extremists

damirniksic — Fri, 23 May 2008 11:44:54 +0000

Vandals damaged or destroyed dozens of graves belonging to Muslims in the Austrian city of Graz, heightening tensions in the southern city where a local politician made disparaging comments about Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).

Police in Graz, about 200 kilometers (120 miles) south of Vienna, said about 60 gravestones belonging to Muslims were found overturned or broken in the central cemetery, but said it was unclear when the vandalism took place. Officials said they could not rule out the possibility that extreme-right groups active in the city may have been behind the attack.

Tensions have risen in Graz since a local female politician from the right-wing Freedom Party disparaged the Prophet Muhammad, calling him a “child molester” who wrote the Quran during “fits of epilepsy.”

Al Arabiya, 6 February 2008

Global Smoke-Free Partnership for a Smoke-Free World

damirniksic — Wed, 21 May 2008 17:34:30 +0000

Garofalo

damirniksic — Wed, 21 May 2008 17:26:40 +0000